NY Times: The Way of the Agnostic.
Comments:
This was a throw-away link, of mild interest because of subject matter. We see few articles mentioning agnosticism these days.
Posted by Garret P Vreeland on 01/24/13 at 03:41 PM
Commenting is not available in this weblog entry.
<< Previous entry: SciAm: Louisiana senator asks if E. coli evolve into persons.
Next entry: McClatchy: We’re in contact with uncontrolled chemicals. >>
Next entry: McClatchy: We’re in contact with uncontrolled chemicals. >>
“..can’t merely cite the lack of decisive evidence for religion.”
Well, if you subscribe in any way to logical thinking, then, “yes”, merely rejecting absurd claims is certainly a strong foundation for a philosophy. The religious need better arguments, not Atheists.
There’s so much to unpack in this article, but to abuse grammar and substitute “religion” for “claimed existence of supernatural beings and origins” is a bit more than disingenuous.
He then moves the argument to whether or not religion fulfills a “human need”(!!) for “love, understanding, and knowledge.” Each he defines into meaninglessness.