dangerousmeta!, the original new mexican miscellany, offering eclectic linkage since 1999.

Hoover Institution: The Death of Honesty.

Cheating in school is unethical for at least four reasons: 1) it gives students who cheat an unfair advantage over those who do not cheat; 2) it is an act of dishonesty in a setting dedicated to a quest for truthful knowledge, 3) it is a violation of trust between student and teacher; and 4) it disrespects the code of conduct and the social order of the school.  As such, one would expect that cheating would provide educators with an ideal platform for imparting the key moral standards of honesty, integrity, trust, and fairness.

In talking with teachers, I’ve heard that policing cheating is nigh impossible with the internet available as a resource. Some kids do it and never give a thought to the right/wrong morality, they think everything is free; others do it tentatively, while some go whole-hog and just don’t care. A perceptive teacher has to make judgments from the childrens’ character ... working within the internet culture of ‘cheating’ (some call it ‘repurposing’) to teach larger lessons.

Anyone else care to chime in?

01/16/12 • 12:43 PM • ChildhoodScholarly • (2) Comments

Comments:

Kunstler nailed this:
<blockquote:>” The clowns and villains who run America have accomplished something really epic: they have vanquished meaning. Nobody knows what anything means anymore. Anything goes now. All bets are off. It’s not reassuring. It leads to bad things happening like blood in the streets. When nothing means anything anymore, some people will actually strive, make an effort, to reestablish meaning in practical economic and political life, because civilized life is impossible without it. So, in those historic moments when civilization is suspended, people will work like hell to restore meaning. Sometimes though, like Germany in the 1930s, you discover that the suspension of civilization is itself intoxicating, and you ride with that for a while."</blockquote>

“Cheating” is not “taught in schools”, as this “libertarian” Hoover dipshit intones, but instead is the result of a series of other inputs.

People “cheat” because it’s worth it.

Posted by Jeremiah on 01/21/12 at 04:44 PM

I have no great respect for Hoover as a source ... purely using it as a lever for my own anecdote, given above.

I am endlessly curious about how modern schoolchildren and schoolteachers are dealing with the internet.

For instance, how does a teacher handle the following:

“Give me a 3 page book report on the JFK Assassination.”

Now, kids have no way of telling an authoritative source, vs. a completely wigged-out conspiracy site.

What do kids and teachers do in this situation? I really want to know. I’ll keep asking till I find out for real.

Posted by Garret P Vreeland on 01/21/12 at 08:21 PM

 

Leave a comment:

name:

email:

url //:

Your email is not published.
Basic HTML is allowed. Smileys are available, if you're so inclined.

Save personal info (so you don't have to keep entering it)?

Send an email if someone else comments on this thread?

Submit the word you see below:



<< Previous entry: Who Design Today: 50 Breathtaking Vintage Photographs of Businesses From 1820.

Next entry: WaPo: 10 reasons the U.S. is no longer the land of the free. >>