ABC News:
New Hampshire’s Polling Fiasco. “Prof. Jon Krosnick of Stanford University has another argument: That the order of names on the New Hampshire ballot - in which, by random draw, Clinton was toward the top, Obama at the bottom - netted her about 3 percentage points more than she’d have gotten otherwise.” Interesting little supposition. But if people pay less attention to polls and concentrate on issues instead ...
Comments:
There are no comments at this time for this entry.
Commenting is not available in this weblog entry.
Previous entry: Looks like
Next entry: SF New Mexican:
